Bernard stated, “We have reached the fraud stage of social control in the evolution of succession [through the] forms of [that] control.” According to this sociologist, social control contrives itself on framing a network in which it will consequently turn on itself and create the need for “means” in a society engulfed in self-interest. In this manner, this is how the members of Yes Men operate. The swindle, the mark, and the operatives are the subversive means of deception that the Yes Men employ. “[With some degree of] establish[ed]… rapport [with the] mark, he [will] see… that the mark will trust him… [and] the con man [creates a scheme to evoke the dishonesty of the mark] (Schur). Being a brilliant form of what Debord termed as detournement, the Yes Men bring the act of hacker activism to a new degree to allow the consequences and power of “social control” to expose and fix itself. Whether some artists agree with their artistic method, I believe that their work holds an aesthetic of “intelligence” in art that has been long upheld in societies.
In the case of Yes Men, the “means” and purpose become “identity correction.” Led by the activists, Andy Bichlbaum and Mike Bananno, they use tactical media to correct the identities of large corporations and organizations. Their purpose is to address the abuse of power within these systems that affect their society and the world at large. Their movie, Yes Men, focuses on the World Trade Organization (WTO). By taking over the appearance of the organization’s website, they were able to attract the attention of those desiring association with the WTO and pose as spokesmen in their favor. With the structure of social control, they were able to research and fit into the ‘norm’ as standards of appearance and language give the power back to the individual. This action in itself is satirical of social control and power, since the abuse of control and power is now manipulating ‘the abuser’. Then again, this relates back to De Certeau’s explanation of consumers and producers that move within a “technocratically constructed space, [using an already established vocabulary].” These become the tools that the individuals will form into pseudonymous invention and challenge and critique their society and art practice.
Just within the field of art, “Introduction to net.art 1994-1999,” and “Fluidities and Oppositions Among Curators, Filter Feeders, and Future Artists” are examples of the satirical nature of individuals and networked operatives critiquing the sub-society of art. They deconstruct themselves in order to address the abuse of control within their world and evolve the methods of Debord. As the society works itself into a self-indulgent state, it begins to wear down its well-formed structure. The same is true of works, such as the autocannibalistic, Google Will Eat Itself. GWEI recycles incoming money from Google’s text advertisement accounts to buy shares of the Google Company. As the system continually updates, the system in the end will buy itself. This work mimics how technological is now possessing the “societal control structure” and creating a “norm” in a space of unreality. Therefore, the evolution of social control and power abuse are emerging to a level that swindler is now beyond the “means.” By forming an unconscious power, the aesthetics of this art form, tactical media can alone embody “intelligence” and create a new standard that the next generation of media artists will have to evolve and expand farther into.
------------------------
Bain, R., Bernard, L. L., & American Sociological Society. (1934). The Fields and Methods of Sociology. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.
Hollingshead, A. B. (January 01, 1941). The Concept of Social Control. American Sociological Review, 6, 2, 217-224
Lambert, D. R., & NAVAL OCEAN SYSTEMS CENTER SAN DIEGO CA. (1987). A Cognitive Model for Exposition of Human Deception and Counterdeception. Ft. Belvoir: Defense Technical Information Center.
Schur, E. M. (January 01, 1957). Sociological Analysis of Confidence Swindling. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 48, 3.)